0.07/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.07/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.14/0.34	% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
0.14/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.14/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.14/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.14/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.14/0.34	% CPULimit   : 960
0.14/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.14/0.34	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 06:03:00 EDT 2022
0.14/0.35	% CPUTime    : 
0.20/0.47	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.20/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.20/0.47	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.20/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting new_ho_8 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# full_lambda_10 with pid 28077 completed with status 0
0.20/0.48	# Result found by full_lambda_10
0.20/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,5,20000,3.0,true)
0.20/0.48	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/1
0.20/0.48	# Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-SSSFFMNN
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 65s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# post_as_ho12 with pid 28084 completed with status 0
0.20/0.48	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.20/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,5,20000,3.0,true)
0.20/0.48	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/1
0.20/0.48	# Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-SSSFFMNN
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 65s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.20/0.48	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.20/0.48	
0.20/0.48	# Proof found!
0.20/0.48	# SZS status Theorem
0.20/0.48	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_22, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(cTHM139_pme, conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(?[X2:$i > $i, X3:$i]:(((X2 @ X3)=(X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM139_pme)).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:$i]:(?[X2:$i > $i, X3:$i]:(((X2 @ X3)=(X1))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM139_pme])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X8:$i > $i, X9:$i]:(((X8 @ X9)!=(esk1_0))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $i, X1:$i]:(((X2 @ X1)!=(esk1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]), ['proof']).
0.20/0.48	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.20/0.48	# Parsed axioms                        : 1
0.20/0.48	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.20/0.48	# Initial clauses                      : 1
0.20/0.48	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.20/0.48	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 1
0.20/0.48	# Processed clauses                    : 2
0.20/0.48	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.20/0.48	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.20/0.48	# ...remaining for further processing  : 2
0.20/0.48	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.20/0.48	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.20/0.48	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.20/0.48	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.20/0.48	# Generated clauses                    : 1
0.20/0.48	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
0.20/0.48	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.20/0.48	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.20/0.48	# Paramodulations                      : 0
0.20/0.48	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.20/0.48	# NegExts                              : 0
0.20/0.48	# Equation resolutions                 : 1
0.20/0.48	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.20/0.48	# Current number of processed clauses  : 1
0.20/0.48	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.20/0.48	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.20/0.48	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.20/0.48	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
0.20/0.48	# ...number of literals in the above   : 0
0.20/0.48	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.20/0.48	# Current number of archived clauses   : 1
0.20/0.48	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.20/0.48	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.20/0.48	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.20/0.48	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.20/0.48	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.20/0.48	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.20/0.48	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.20/0.48	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.20/0.48	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.20/0.48	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 68
0.20/0.48	
0.20/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.48	# User time                : 0.002 s
0.20/0.48	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.20/0.48	# Total time               : 0.003 s
0.20/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1620 pages
0.20/0.48	
0.20/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.48	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.20/0.48	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.20/0.48	# Total time               : 0.006 s
0.20/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
0.20/0.48	EOF